Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Kelsey Bjarnason |
Date | 02/09/2017 01:28 (02/08/2017 16:28) |
Message-ID | <8mpsmd-kfd.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Steve Carroll |
Followups | Steve Carroll (6m) Snit (8m) Steve Carroll (1h & 19m) |
Steve Carroll%2Fwww>>
On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 10:44:22 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:Snit
On 2/8/17, 9:51 AM, in article D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:More than a decade later, and in a different group, Sandman is STILL lying about his CSS:uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F
On 2/7/17, 11:27 PM, in article sandman-f6d45685d946ef1ca402b3326854b9aa@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?
2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&w>>.andman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%s
web.archive.org/weaI noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid. You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors. This is a direct lie from you.r ning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>And, lo and behold - it validates perfectly, thus 100% exposing your lie.
This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-css-detail.pdf>
You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://
&warning=0&profile=css21&usermedium>>>all>b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/
atlas/inAnd, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/
Weaver","chrisv","PeterK","FeebR","ChrisA","GreyCloud","vallor","Godhe","tmelmosfire","Sandman","WilliamP","DFS","Tim"];Steve Carrollclude/styles_plain.phpLooking at the errors you had...
http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/
Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show. I pointed out your CSS had errors. You fixed it and then your ego got in your way and you felt you had to deny it. You lied. And here you are, over a decade later, STILL lying about it.
You cannot stop yourself from lying.
You wasted your life? Yes, we know. If you hadn't, you may have been able to...
const posters = ["owl","Snit","Slimer","Marek","RonB","Melzzzzz","Mike
function moronRemover(arr) { let argList = arr.slice.call(arguments); argList.splice(0,1); return arr.filter(function(moron) { return argList.indexOf(moron) === -1; }); }If you defined an array containing the names up at the top, why are you passing in a collection of literals here, instead of the array?
moronRemover(posters, "Snit","tmelmosfire","Mike Weaver","FeebR");