Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 02/09/2017 23:58 (02/09/2017 14:58) |
| Message-ID | <ddb8f963-dd16-470f-9d0c-b68f6412c7f7@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 3:49:23 PM UTC-7, Sandman wrote:
SandmanWould it really surprise you, though? Consider: He just wrote this...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D4C23D0E.8F4BB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanWhat you did was get your ass handed to you in the main part of this thread so you had to ignore that, but you felt that it was too obvious that you were running away screaming so you tried to post some "humorous" irrelevancy instead in this sub thread.Snit
Man, I said you had two CSS files and really you had one external file and some embedded CSS. Yeah, that was horrid!
Yeah, you made an explicit claim that turned out to be 100% incorrect and when pointed out you ran away ignoring it alltogether.SnitSandman
Meanwhile you tried to pull a fast one and got busted validating with a CSS3 validater when that did not even exist at the time...
How slow are you? CSS3 is from 1999, you lied about this in *2006*. Is all of this idiocy from you based on the fact that in 2006 you CSS-validated a CSS3 file with a CSS2 setting? That would be *HILARIOUS*!
"Carroll posted some of the code they are using for their flooding" - Snit
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/EfMRiO3cAEI/fsrRE1gfCQAJ>
... about the javascript in this post:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/rhLhQcRhZnE/R2-MNaXDCAAJ>
Similar to yesterday's BS:
"Looks like a part of the flooding script Carroll and Sandman have made." - Snit
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/rhLhQcRhZnE/4lRZVCbYCAAJ>
You can't make this stuff up... he really is *that* clueless ;)
02/08/2017-
