Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 02/16/2017 17:36 (02/16/2017 09:36) |
| Message-ID | <D4CB233B.9032A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Steve Carroll (13m) Sandman (35m) > Snit |
On 2/16/17, 9:24 AM, in article sandman-4ec6e72206a7783a1645da99095f9805@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanAlready answered: since it would bypass your primary trolling games which work in text you would never want to. And you never will. That simple.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4CB1A09.902F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
If you believe the above is true then bypass my games with a Skype.
Not sure how many times I've asked now and you've ignored the question: Why? Why would I want to Skype with you?
What you had to ignore in your post:I have answered repeatedly: your accusations where you obsess over me -- claiming I have forged PDFs, accusing me of using names I have not, and on and on and on and on and on. Even if you think these are true -- which you surely do not -- they prove your obsession about me.SandmanSnitSandmanSnitSnitSandman
I just want him to move the hell on. Hey, open deal -- if Sandman stops trolling me and removes all the accusations he has about me from his site
What accusations?
How about the ones posted to your site?
And I ask again - What accusations?
Any and all.
And now I ask for the third time - *What accusations?*
But no matter how many times I answer your question you can snip it and otherwise play games and say I have not (see below for perfect examples). In text.
In a Skype session that would be harder -- hence the reason you will never Skype.
Even if you claim to believe it you make the accusation (which also shows your obsession with me).SnitSandman
You have all sorts of accusations about me using socks,
Nope, none of that. I have substantiated claims however. You know, those facts you fear so much.
Even if you claim to believe it you make the accusation (which also shows your obsession with me).SnitSandman
about me forging PDFs
Substantiated claims.
I just noted it. And see below where you just babble on and on... with Skype that would be harder to do. Hence why you will NEVER Skype with me.SnitSandman
all sorts of nonsense trolling.
Yet none that you can point to.
You are afraid.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.SnitSandman
No, I do not care if you claim they are true.
I don't care what you care about, so I don't even know why you are typing those letters in a post directed at me.SnitSandman
They are a testiment to your frustration and anger.
I don't care if you claim that is true.SnitSandman
They are proof of your inability to stop trolling.
I don't care if you claim that is true.SnitSandman
And since you cannot answer in text can we Skype?
Funny, coming from the guy that have yet to answer my question above.SandmanSnitSnitSandman
How about the accusations where you attribute the words of names other than "Snit" (me) to me.
I only ever attribute posts to you on posts made by you.
See: text does not work for you.
Works fine for me, don't know what problems you're having with it. have you tried turning it off and on again?SnitSandman
Yes or no: do you attribute the words of people other than "Snit" (me) to me? Simple question.
Nope. I only ever attribute posts from you with your handle.SnitSandman
The answer is you do.
Unsubstantiated claimSnitSandman
But you cannot admit it in text. So let's Skype.
Why?SandmanSnitSnitSandman
How about just stopping ALL that nonsense.
What nonsense?
In text you are not able to understand.
Understand what?SnitSandman
Let's Skype.
Why?SnitSandman
On and on you go...
Sounds like it's snipping time for Snit. Run away little boy, it's all you've got when I respond with a reasonable discussion. What you snipped:SandmanSnitSnitSandman
I will remove the PDFs that show his CSS failing from my site.
Why would I care about what you have on your site?
OK, if you do not care than I will leave them.
You actually thought I gave a flying shit what you have on your site? That's hilarious.SnitSandman
I absolutely prefer if you would remove your attacks against me from your site
What attacks?SnitSandman
and stop posting them to Usenet.
Where did I do that?SandmanSnitSnitSandman
In other words: if Sandman agrees to remove his lies (even if he does not admit they are lies)
What supposed lies?
All of the "digests" and other nonsense.
There are no "lies" in any of my digests, many of which aren't even about you.SnitSandman
Look at ANY of your pages dealing with me.
What about them?SandmanSnitSnitSandman
I will remove those PDFs from my site.
I don't give a shit what PDF's you have on your site, Snit. What gave you the idea that I did? That's hilarious!
You have been trolling me over them for more than a decade.
40+ threads about your CSS lie from you - 0 from me.SandmanSnitSnitSandman
Not sure if I have any other examples of my "task" to get all the pages... so that task will have to be dropped, too (or I will have to update the software I used to make it). But so be it... I will drop that task if Sandman drops his trolling over his CSS.
40+ threads about your CSS lies, 0 from me. I wonder who is going to "drop" it, ey? :-D
First: you focus on threads and not posts.
Again, it's the guy that keeps bringing up these decade old lies of yours that is the one that needs to let it go - not the one that never brings it up. That would be me.SnitSandman
That is dishonest or deceptive at the very best.
Incorrect, when I point out your obsession with your exposed lie, a good way to point to it is the numerous times you've created new threads about it without being prompted by me.SnitSandman
It is certainly not an honest metric.
Keep telling yourself that.SandmanSnitSnit
Sandman: deal?To be clear: you cannot just deny your trolling -- you HAVE to stop and HAVE to remove those pages from your site. ALL of them. NO trolling me on your site. NO trolling me in Usenet. NO trolling me or lying about me anywhere over how much this rips you apart.Sandman
You're a hoot! You work so hard to fit the Objective Troll Criteria with your every post.
Will you agree... or not?
I can't agree to remove something you have yet to show even exists, now can I? Will you agree to stop hitting your kids?SnitSandman
To NOT agree means you are going to continue to attribute the words of posts not from "Snit" to me
If you post to usenet, and I respond to that post, I will attribute it with your handle. It's just that easy. If you don't want me to attribute your posts to you, then don't post at all. Do we have a deal?SnitSandman
(which is dishonest of you), you will continue to leave up and maybe even add attacks on your site about me
I can not "leave up" something that doesn't exist.SnitSandman
you will continue to blame ME for your actions of posting that nonsense, etc.
I will continue to point out and substantiate the *fact* that the Objective Troll Criteria was requested by you, as well as the Relational Troll Scoring.
This was probably your biggest mistake of all time - ask for substantiation from someone that has the means to provide it in droves, for years and years and years, from someone that could fully document your trolling and visualise it for everyone to see (as if they needed it, but still).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYpdIyAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRMnkH/3yNPUdCL97VC3eiGpZw9ujA bggrlLrjafNQl7W7nqTI8VP7yhO/NZaP0yUajXkV++BY2SwL6rhe4Ygk1TNvf7CZ 974WV6liO4fCnTIuGzMP+cPE+4NMER3rkOb04+v5AiVye1g5kpNDE/El7TTAjWip j58urtVPk91xLBqv6sx41BRtbIhyzxfHIeJPI02pXO7zwy1hE9HLFWfjlqUz1K0C hD5mmb57vt0uaSxrviEE0onWngDgI3BAw5FBMU7ys+qKBpCCj9PE/g189igeWCJN KoeqUavmt5WPOhu8BXktoV6w8i6zWO+ZcRzk9TR2JoEMlX9H+Lx3vPTcz0rZsg0>=cR5F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
02/08/2017-
