Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/16/2017 23:08 (02/16/2017 23:08) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-9a04f4793e4996629942a2288a02a4a1@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Sandman (11m) Snit (2h & 8m) |
In article <D4CB5EBF.903D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Not really, here is when you asked me to create the Objective Troll Criteria:SnitSandmanSandmanSteve Carroll
This post of yours now is logged as "Ignoring 99%" in the snip/ignore statistics of your responses (or lack of responses) to my posts that does not log your trolling: <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitsnip>
Where is the RTS?
Here: http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring
Let me guess: that was made close to the time I showed your CSS to not pass validation, right?
Snit 04/28/2004 08:56:16 PM <BCB54C60.4C654%snit@nospam.cableone.com>
"What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?"
This is where you lied about my CSS
Snit 05/31/2006 11:23:14 AM <C0A2AE92.50295%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
"your CSS does not validate correctly"
And this is where you asked me nicely to show you the network of people that call you a troll, something I called the Relational Troll Scoring.
Snit 07/04/2006 10:05:37 AM <C0CF6F61.53F03%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
"please support your claims of who does and does not have any network of people calling whoever names..."
Mind you, it was a bit of work, so it wasn't done until later. Google Groups won't let me search for it at the moment, saying a "new version of the application" is needed, telling me to reload, but nothing happens. It's also not in my index any longer I'm afraid. I'll let you know if I find it.
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
