Subject | Re: Advocacy |
From | Snit |
Date | 09/07/2017 22:13 (09/07/2017 13:13) |
Message-ID | <D5D6F691.B5240%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Marek Novotny |
Followups | Steve Carroll (22h & 25m) |
Marek NovotnyLOL! How convenient. Seriously, that is funny!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2017-09-07, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:
// snipSteve CarrollMarek Novotny
Unless someone pretending to be me emailed him, this one makes no sense... I'm gonna assume that's what happened. Why would I ask anyone here to to lie about you when anyone can see, as plain as day, what you are? It just doesn't make sense. I've never needed help from anyone other than you to point out your "wrongs" ;)
As for him believing that I *am* you, seems you got in his head. I don't know what all that stuff was about the keys and having been infiltrated or whatnot but it didn't come from me.
Looks like I didn't save them at all.
Wish I had but I didn't. So I can't say what address they specifically came from. All I can say is that at the time I was asking each of you to email me and was trying to broker a truce, snit emailed me and either you did or one of the many variants of you did.One of the many variants of him. LOL! This gets better and better! And I emailed you WANTING a truce. I still do... with him and with you. I have no desire to see you two push your idiotic battles... but as long as you do, Marek, I will respond by pointing it out however I like.
At that time I was not aware of all the look-a-likes.Irrelevant: no matter which account Carroll uses it is still him.
So I just can't say for sure. Therefore I can't in good faith say it was you. Consider it retracted.Ah, so it was Carroll but you do not know which account he used so you retract saying it was Carroll.
Save this if you like, I've signed it with signature.Oh, I am sure your back pedaling on your nonsense will be referenced again and again and again. Carroll asked you to lie and you admitted you did... but said you did so because it pleases you. But given your above comments it does lead to editing of my references to some of your nonsense: