Google| Subject | Re: Re: Advocacy |
| From | Steve Carroll (Snit) |
| Date | 09/07/2017 10:37 (09/07/2017 01:37) |
| Message-ID | <f38a7f9f-49d6-4148-884c-00b73a65d6ba@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 1:23:56 AM UTC-7, Sandman wrote:
SandmanSteve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll's obsession with Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis started in 2004 when Carroll got mad about his then girlfriend obsessing over Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis (heavily documented here: <http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot>). Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis continued to respond to Steve for about 5 years, when Steve flipped out in 2009 and started contacting Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis's employer with the stated goal to have him fired (he spoke of doing so even if he had to twist arms):
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D5D6489F.B4F6D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D6138C.B4EFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"By the way, did you know you cannot even block comments with YouTube?"Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D62304.B4F14%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"Only way to block comments was with a Firefox extension which no longer works..."Blocking comments in youtube - a feature available since 2013.Snit <C26F69BB.8157D%CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>"When I make mistakes I am happy to admit to them"Snit
Interesting that you have no comment on the FireFox extensions?
I know nothing about any comment-blocking firefox extensions. I know these explicit statements are incorrect: Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D6138C.B4EFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "By the way, did you know you cannot even block comments with YouTube?" Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D62304.B4F14%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"Only way to block comments was with a Firefox extension which no longer works..." And ironically, this statement, which has turned out to be very incorrect: Snit <C26F69BB.8157D%CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
"When I make mistakes I am happy to admit to them" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZsQIYAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRI/IIAJy3sfA5bG+Kegn4rUFCinhA 1FYzbKaxWCnKHotNKJmFjtXVjkfw11MdDW4X8fJgsByHFPYTdRui2NzBocXdUVnH 2hGlg+MGHa4o+8gDmJry/esrN3hHG5Bvifc8U5Tr7Us4F1akrtAoBdMkulQLXx6q HJ6PExwzSYc4IalfOYEB7aM4Akubrd1CMI+GChGtMrrPOaAN/qIqNlAu6tYWRxqh HBT19Oqp6fDvRbJM+tom1p3itYqfDsHiYv4sqbaHkW+gAmF1LzgcH23ZO9nNV8rs dpdAJ3WoBFJu6hByTk0H+UTQfgj1eySYTy62oiLke+nekQ2ymH5NRoT1rT4yA8U= =yFMS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sandman
<http://goo.gl/OHNryA> <http://goo.gl/MZ6yCD> <http://goo.gl/WaKKGq>
There were more, but Carroll has had them deleted from the Google archive. I have not spent the time to find them elsewhere (and likely will not).
With that Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis stopped responding directly to Steve except for *one* chance he gave him in 2011 when Steve was accusing *Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis* of running: <http://goo.gl/racU64>.
Carroll, as predicted, ran (he always does when faced with facts): <http://goo.gl/qHs5Xh>
Steven Petruzzellis knows he has no backing for any of his nonsense and has become, if anything, more and more obsessive since Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis stopped responding to him.
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is truly a very, very sick man.
-- Do not click this link! http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow Jonas Eklundh
09/06/2017
