Google| Subject | Re: Advocacy |
| From | Melzzzzz |
| Date | 09/07/2017 02:05 (09/07/2017 00:05) |
| Message-ID | <ooq2gl$qk7$3@news.albasani.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (7m) Steve Carroll (23m) |
On 2017-09-07, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
SnitI haven't meant desktop apps like office, photo editor and media players,..., rather apps that can be moved to browser. What can be moved to browser will be moved to browser.
On 9/6/17, 4:58 PM, in article ooq22t$qk7$2@news.albasani.net, "Melzzzzz" <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>wrote:MelzzzzzSnit
On 2017-09-06, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:Steve CarrollMelzzzzz
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 5:49:12 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:F. RussellSteve Carroll
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:14:28 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollF. Russell
... and everyone knows that 9 out of 10 web developers choose... as do those in the server crowd who haven't been strong armed by MS tactics...
Web developers? Servers?
Yeah, you know, that segment where a sh*t-ton of activity is going on with computing... and has been for the last couple of decades.
(snip more 'one true God' drivel)
Yeah, seems that classic desktop applications are dead. You write server code and app works anywhere there is browser ;)
There are some which have moved to pure cloud, such as Google's photo editing offerings, but I do not think desktop apps are going anywhere soon, though more and more have ties to cloud services.
-- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
09/06/2017
