Subject | Re: Advocacy |
From | Steve Carroll (Snit) |
Date | 09/17/2017 18:31 (09/17/2017 09:31) |
Message-ID | <190303a7-ee4f-41e0-a888-bfed09e51faa@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Steve Carroll |
Followups | Steve Carroll (Snit) (15m) > Steve Carroll (Snit) |
Steve Carroll
On Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:08:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:SnitSteve Carroll
On 9/17/17, 8:56 AM, in article i62dnZ-yp56wBiPEnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>wrote:Marek NovotnySnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2017-09-07, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>wrote:On 2017-09-07, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:I was cleaning up my NAS storage and ran into various screen shots there. As luck would have it I found a screen shot of the FASTMAIL rules I had created at one point. One of the rules which you'll find interesting was a rule I made to block all the messages I was getting, I thought, from you Steve. I said I didn't save the messages, but I did make a rule at one point to filter them. And the rule shows the address to filter. The address was frelwizzen@gmail.com.
// snipSteve CarrollMarek Novotny
Unless someone pretending to be me emailed him, this one makes no sense... I'm gonna assume that's what happened. Why would I ask anyone here to to lie about you when anyone can see, as plain as day, what you are? It just doesn't make sense. I've never needed help from anyone other than you to point out your "wrongs" ;)
As for him believing that I *am* you, seems you got in his head. I don't know what all that stuff was about the keys and having been infiltrated or whatnot but it didn't come from me.
Looks like I didn't save them at all. Wish I had but I didn't. So I can't say what address they specifically came from. All I can say is that at the time I was asking each of you to email me and was trying to broker a truce, snit emailed me and either you did or one of the many variants of you did. At that time I was not aware of all the look-a-likes. So I just can't say for sure. Therefore I can't in good faith say it was you. Consider it retracted. Save this if you like, I've signed it with signature.
So Carroll. OK. Now we have poof you were speaking of Carroll. Fair enough.
LOL! You may believe you have "poof" but people with working brains don't buy any of the crap you're regularly pushing so "very, very" hard to sell