Google| Subject | Re: Advocacy |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 09/07/2017 03:04 (09/06/2017 18:04) |
| Message-ID | <53051b3e-eb96-4822-bdf7-15c56370f638@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | F. Russell |
| Followups | (Jeff Relf) (6h & 45m) |
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:53:40 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
F. RussellExplain the error in that statement. You can't because it's a fact.
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:21:25 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollF. Russell
Most of us are old enough to know that you once *had* to have a full blown, "traditional desktop" computer to run software, but those days are long gone.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! He proves his idiocy yet again!
At the engineering company where I am employed, we use 2D and 3D CAD software that absolutely requires powerful desktop workstations.Which has nothing to do with what you thought you comprehended from the above. People locked away in 'computing' cabinets, or cells like the one Snit lives in, often conflate things or get confused.
09/06/2017
