Google| Subject | Re: Re: Advocacy |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 09/07/2017 18:28 (09/07/2017 09:28) |
| Message-ID | <4a26bb0c-45fb-4178-be93-8fcdb1bc943c@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:23:56 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote:
SandmanFunny stuff... here's another good one:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D5D6489F.B4F6D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D6138C.B4EFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"By the way, did you know you cannot even block comments with YouTube?"Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D62304.B4F14%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"Only way to block comments was with a Firefox extension which no longer works..."Blocking comments in youtube - a feature available since 2013.Snit <C26F69BB.8157D%CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>"When I make mistakes I am happy to admit to them"Snit
Interesting that you have no comment on the FireFox extensions?
I know nothing about any comment-blocking firefox extensions. I know these explicit statements are incorrect: Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D6138C.B4EFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "By the way, did you know you cannot even block comments with YouTube?" Snit Re: Advocacy 09/07/2017 <D5D62304.B4F14%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"Only way to block comments was with a Firefox extension which no longer works..." And ironically, this statement, which has turned out to be very incorrect: Snit <C26F69BB.8157D%CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
"When I make mistakes I am happy to admit to them"
"...I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts." - Snit
Message-ID: <C58EB6AA.E9877%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/cQm4puplVDs/TNE-zmnLTtcJ>
Arguably his biggest lie to date. There should be a contest, find 'the one' ;)
09/06/2017
