Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 03/17/2014 07:24 (03/17/2014 07:24) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlid5bq.a1.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (6h & 4m) > Sandman |
In article <uu5ci9h9ei8p9ka75f3smsqslh5qd1hv2m@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
So you're still on record with the hilarious comment that only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop plug-in"?Tony CooperSandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
No, each plug-in listing tells you who developed the plug-in. Adobe is specifying that they didn't develop them.
But you just said that only Adobe can make Photoshop plug-ins, and that page lists Photoshop plug-ins. Tricky situation you've gotten yourself into!
Right. Only Adobe can call plug-in an "Adobe Plugin", but they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop. Strange that some of the most-used plugins are not listed.
Wow, you just dug yourself even deeper. Now you're saying "Adobe Plugin", but this is what you said before:
Yes, it's a typing error on my part. The mind said "Photoshop Plug-in" and the fingers said "Adobe Plug-in".
So, are thesde your statements, then:
1. Only Adobe can make Photoshop plug-ins 2. Lightroom accepts PS plug-ins
I'm just trying to find out the depth of the hole you're sitting in.
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
-
