Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | David Taylor |
| Date | 03/16/2014 13:10 (03/16/2014 12:10) |
| Message-ID | <lg44bg$862$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle |
| Followups | YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle (1h & 13m) > David Taylor nospam (4h & 19m) Eric Stevens (7h & 39m) > David Taylor |
On 16/03/2014 11:13, YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle wrote:
YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlleYes, it was I. For the great majority of photos I take, and the results I want, RAW offers me nothing more than an extra delay in processing. I accept that there are times when the extra dynamic range would help but, coming more from a digital and video background, to me white clipping is quite normal.
Le 15/03/14 22:30, PeterN a écrit :PeterNYouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle
Somehow, I may have missed a word, when replying to, I think is was DavidTaylor, who stated that he never shoots RAW.
Sorry for my mistake. My point was anyway that raw is not about "getting the exposure right", but allowing post processing in good conditions.
Noëlle Adam
I can and do use post-processing on some images, and JPEG is quite adequate for my usage. A lot of talk here seems to be from people who use RAW images in case their exposure is incorrect.
-- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
nospam (4h & 19m)
Eric Stevens (7h & 39m) > David Taylor
03/13/2014-
-
-
