Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 03/15/2014 05:23 (03/15/2014 00:23) |
| Message-ID | <jnk7i9hijg96fon6h1mbfv857tgppfcv58@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (15m) |
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:33:54 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamWhile it might not get your pocket protector in a twist, the use of Photoshop in a non-authorized way might get Adobe's legal department's bowels in an uproar. That's the way Photoshop can to be a generic term and why Adobe doesn't want you to use "photoshopped" as a verb.
i'm telling you, as someone who has written photoshop plug-ins, making a distinction between 'photoshop plug-in' and 'plug-in for photoshop' is utterly ridiculous and shows just how much of an idiot you really are.
See #5 at http://www.adobe.com/legal/permissions/trademarks.html
They may not care what the boys say when guzzling their Mountain Dew, but what goes on a website or product ad is a different thing.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
03/13/2014-
-
-
