Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle |
| Date | 03/14/2014 15:14 (03/14/2014 15:14) |
| Message-ID | <lfv2rj$rbu$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Rikishi42 |
Le 14/03/14 02:18, Rikishi42 a écrit :
Rikishi42Standard is not normalised :). It is more "commonly used". And even things almost normalised as the exifs and meta-data fields are (there has been some effort for that) have big holes.
On 2014-03-13, YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle <FautLaDemander@simple.org>wrote:Rikishi42YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlleNige Danton
If it matters I'm shooting with a Nikon D7000 and an 18-105 lens. I shoot in RAW and jpg.
Raw developpement for Nikon is at its best with Capture NX 2 (because Nikon raws are non-standard)
Non-standard RAW's? But that implies there would be standard RAW files.
Where are they defined and since when ????
More or less there is some common ground that allow third parties like adobe to devellop the raw files from different manufacturers. lie color temp is always coded the same way, even if different software may interpret it with slight differences. Where to find the matrix is also common.
Noëlle Adam
03/13/2014-
-
-
