Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | Savageduck |
| Date | 03/15/2014 23:06 (03/15/2014 15:06) |
| Message-ID | <201403151506216239-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
On 2014-03-15 21:49:02 +0000, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>said:
Tony CooperI have PSE9 because it was bundled with some piece of hardware I bought, and I have on occasion used it.
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 14:12:45 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:Tony CooperSavageduckSavageduckPeterN
Agreed. As a CS6/CC user I find PSE odd and a little awkward to work with, but that is just me and my opinion.
There are mony who agree with you.
On which point do they agree with me; that as a PS CS6/CC user I find PSE odd and a little awkward to work with, or that it is just my opinion?? ...or perhaps both? ;-)
Are you being fair? I have Elements 9 because that's what my daughter uses, and sometimes I want to work with the same program she's used to on her photographs when she's down here learning about post-processing techniques.
I know what I want to do, and how do to it, but I kinda hunt and peck around the interface because things aren't where I'm used to with CS6.As I have said PSE is not the equal of PS CS/CC in many respects, but it is more that adequate for those with fewer demands, and who have not been tainted with the CS/CC curse.
Daughter does not hesitate.Good for her.
I think when we don't work with something frequently, and work with a similar program frequently, the program we work with infrequently seems awkward.No kidding! The issue is for those who are led to believe that PSE is all that PS CS6/CC is, with just a few exceptions, only to discover there is a reason it is not priced the same and is sometimes bundled for free.
The bottom line is PSE and PS CS/CC are as different as a Ford Pinto and a Ferrari. They will both get you to your destination, but not in quite the same way.
-- Regards,
Savageduck
03/13/2014-
-
-
