Subject | Re: post processing |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 03/17/2014 10:47 (03/17/2014 01:47) |
Message-ID | <87wqftgnr0.fld@apaflo.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | David Taylor (10m) > Floyd L. Davidson |
Eric StevensA young lady who is 16 years old asked me to shoot a passport picture for her a couple weeks ago. She a neighbor that I've been photographing since she was 2 years old and I have literally a tens of thousands of pictures of her.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:55:53 +0000, David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid>wrote:David TaylorEric Stevens
On 16/03/2014 19:50, Eric Stevens wrote: []Eric StevensDavid Taylor
A more accurate interpretation might be that they use RAW images because of the scene's wide dynamic range.
I will use JPG for snapshots but not for images where I might want to print them to a reasonable size. In that case I prefer my own image massaging to whatever might be done by the camera.
It's both - you can plan on using RAW if you know that the scene /needs/ it, but the impression I get from reports here is that often it is the saviour of inappropriate exposure.
As printing needs here rarely exceed 30 cm (12 inches), and most images are for HD TV or Web display, my requirements are fortunately less stringent than yours. My Nikon and Sony cameras do a good job in-camera.
I'm exploring what I can do with A2 or thereabouts. :-)