Subject | Re: post processing |
From | nospam |
Date | 03/16/2014 17:37 (03/16/2014 12:37) |
Message-ID | <160320141237389068%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (4h & 36m) > nospam |
because you're ignorant.Tony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
Read down to where it says "The plug-ins here are from Adobe approved publishers, meaning that Adobe has reviewed and accepted the publisher."
it's a marketing agreement. nothing more.
Weasel away, but the point is that Adobe *does* approve some vendors and withholds approval on others.
not for creating plug-ins, they don't.
admit your mistake.
I never said anything about "creating" a plug-in.
Approval is a later step.no it's not.
not based on what you've written. you know *nothing* about software development or the industry.Tony CooperI asked if Adobe approved any vendors and you insisted on ducking the question, evading an answer, and harping on the fact that it's not needed. Obviously, you didn't know that Adobe does, in fact, approve some plug-ins. Now you know.nospam
only to showcase, which has absolutely nothing to do with creating a plug-in.
again, all it takes is an idea, downloading the sdk and writing a plug-in. adobe doesn't know if you even started writing something let alone finish and publish it.
I understand, and have from the get-go, that you don't need Adobe's approval to create or provide a plug-in for an Adobe product.
What I asked is if Adobe does approve some vendors. And, they do.only if the vendors are interested in marketing with adobe. some might be, others are not. it is absolutely not required at all.