Skip to main content
news

Re: post processing

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectRe: post processing
FromSandman
Date03/17/2014 15:03 (03/17/2014 15:03)
Message-ID<slrnlie07a.t1.mr@irc.sandman.net>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsTony Cooper
In article <5vudi9p2uj5ae4ksfkd8ggbncp3fibr7kg@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:

Tony Cooper
Evidently, your reading skills are not working today. Anyone can create a plug-in to be used with Photoshop. They cannot legitimately call it a "Photoshop Plug-in", though.

Sandman
You've made that stupid statement a couple of times now. I've been busy laughing at you - but I think it's time for you to actually, you know, substantiate it.

You claim that only Adobe can "call" a plug-in a "Photoshop plug-in" and we know that many developers call their plug-ins "Photoshop plug-in"

Tony Cooper
Yes, we do. Evidence of misuse doesn't change anything.

But you have yet to established that this actually is misuse, Tony. We're waiting.

Sandman
and we know that Adobe lists third party plugin's under the heading "Photoshop plug-in" so so far there is nothing out there in the real world that has yet to align to your claims.

Tony Cooper
You snipped the link to that page while posting other links. Why's that?

To what page, the Adobe exchange link? I snipped no link from my post. You're the one who snips out things you're running away from, Tony. You know, like you just did. Again.

The Adobe Exchange page is published by Adobe. If Adobe wants to list vendors/programs that are approved by Adobe, that's up to them. They also stated on that page that the plug-ins were *for* Photoshop.

Also that they are "Photoshop plugins".

Sandman
So, please tell us again how these people can't "call" their plugins the way they are already calling them, Tony.

Tony Cooper
Evidence of misuse doesn't change anything.

So what plugin's where you in reference to here:

"Lightroom accepts PS plug-ins"

Go ahead, snip away your mistake yet again and pretend it never happened.

-- Sandman[.net]