Skip to main content
news

Re: post processing

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: post processing
FromTony Cooper
Date03/15/2014 18:11 (03/15/2014 13:11)
Message-ID<p429i9h1b3iar690dggpladrr8egijqhu5@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (32m) > Tony Cooper

On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:35:36 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:

Sandman
"Photoshop Plug-ins"

Is it your claim now that the plug-ins listed on that page were all written by Adobe, Tony?

Tony Cooper
No, each plug-in listing tells you who developed the plug-in. Adobe is specifying that they didn't develop them.

Sandman
But you just said that only Adobe can make Photoshop plug-ins, and that page lists Photoshop plug-ins. Tricky situation you've gotten yourself into!

Tony Cooper
Right. Only Adobe can call plug-in an "Adobe Plugin",

nospam
twist twist twist.

Tony Cooper
but they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop.

nospam
approval is not required to write photoshop plug-ins. all that's needed is to download the sdk and start writing.

Are you disagreeing, then, that Adobe can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop? Adding your comment to disagree with mine? That "can" is not possible?

Or did you just want to say something meaningless?

it does take some intelligence to write a plug-in, so that does rule you out, however.

Tony Cooper
The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop.

nospam
it's a marketing page. there may be an agreement between adobe and the companies to be listed.

Is that not "approval"?

there is no approval.

If they have an agreement with the vendors, is that not an approval?

Tony Cooper
Strange that some of the most-used plugins are not listed.

nospam
nothing strange about that at all.

Tony Cooper
Amazing that you can see words there that are not visible to the human eye. OnOne is clearly avoiding trademark infringement by using "companion" and stating that what they offer are plugins that work with the Adobe products.

nospam
there is no avoidance of trademark infringement.

Well, they didn't infringe. That's avoidance.

But then maybe you know what was going on in their mind when they used "companion". Sit next to someone on an airplane and find this out? -- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL