Subject | Re: post processing |
From | nospam |
Date | 03/14/2014 04:17 (03/13/2014 23:17) |
Message-ID | <130320142317075845%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
more of your usual idiocy.Tony CoopernospamSavageduckTony Cooper
For most photography oriented folks LR is all that is needed.
Depends. If "most" is all photographers, then LR is probably sufficient. But, when we talk about "photography oriented" people, the thought is of people who take the photograph from capture to best representation. Then, at least Elements should be part of the post-processing package.
Not to downgrade LR's "Develop" module, but I think the photographer who wants to finish the process is handcuffed without PS in some form.
finish what process? lightroom can do a *lot*, without any handcuffs.
What is a "lot"? What are you, in kindergarten? A "lot", if it doesn't include what you want to do is "not enough".
of course it does. compositing is one of several things that is extremely difficult if not impossible to do in lightroom, but very easy to do in photoshop.nospamTony Cooper
most people aren't going to composite multiple images,
Composite? Composites have nothing to do with it.
You ever heard of Layer Masks? Other processing involving Layers?of course, and some of what can be done with layers and masking can be done in lightroom directly without needing either. not all, but the point is that photoshop is not always needed.
wrong.nospamTony Cooper
but those that do can get photoshop elements or cs/cc and use it with lightroom.
Naughty, naughty. Snipping to delete pertinent commentary.
My post included:again, no.
"Depends. If "most" is all photographers, then LR is probably sufficient. But, when we talk about "photography oriented" people, the thought is of people who take the photograph from capture to best representation. Then, at least Elements should be part of the post-processing package."