Google| Subject | Re: post processing |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 03/17/2014 14:14 (03/17/2014 09:14) |
| Message-ID | <itsdi9hpvo781ftb97i3od0qsckq9j0jhr@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Sandman (23m) > Tony Cooper nospam (31m) |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:52:32 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamEvidently, your reading skills are not working today. Anyone can create a plug-in to be used with Photoshop. They cannot legitimately call it a "Photoshop Plug-in", though.
In article <81qdi9p509anhalqskqa7cqu8d57g8412o@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:nospamSandmanTony Cooper
So you're still on record with the hilarious comment that only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop plug-in"?
Yup. Only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop Plug-in". The rest should call theirs "Plug-in for Photoshop".
wrong.nospamSandmanTony Cooper
So, are thesde your statements, then:
1. Only Adobe can make Photoshop plug-ins
Never said that.
you just did, above.
I don't know if Adobe ever makes one, though. A plug-in that Adobe makes would be one created by Adobe.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
03/13/2014-
-
-
