Subject | Re: post processing |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 03/14/2014 16:03 (03/14/2014 11:03) |
Message-ID | <si56i9drav6442ckmdkivsre0br1pbs10b@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (48m) > Tony Cooper |
SandmanWhat is the distinction? Actually, you are using a term that doesn't apply when you use "PS plug-ins" to mean OnOne and NIK. These companies don't claim to be "PS plug-ins" or "LR plug-ins". Nowhere on there sites does it claim that.
In article <mk36i998cpti7l72reku48nn955r17s7gh@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
I have OnOne, and it works as a plug-in for both Photoshop and Lightroom or as a stand-alone. It's no different in use from editing in Photoshop from Lightroom.
Who talked about use, Tony? I specifically asked whether or not it was the same actual plugin, or two versions of the plugin - one for each application.
Dunno, Popinjay. All I know is that it works in use, and that's the only thing that matters. What's the point of worrying over whether the installer installs two different versions or not if the program works in use?
It's a pretty important distinction when one makes an absolute claim such as this one:
Tony Cooper Re: post processing 03/13/2014 <evo3i9p9n2fuik675s20suc9q39b7kqlq3@4ax.com>
"Lightroom accepts PS plug-ins."
Which, as it turns out, was false.