Subject | Re: post processing |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 03/14/2014 02:57 (03/13/2014 21:57) |
Message-ID | <j7o4i9triv14pq6r6gjklfhrl6h2u57r3q@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (1h & 19m) |
nospamWhat is a "lot"? What are you, in kindergarten? A "lot", if it doesn't include what you want to do is "not enough".
In article <m164i9ht6r9gdo91mnfll5e8r8g3qv6p9i@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:nospamSavageduckTony Cooper
For most photography oriented folks LR is all that is needed.
Depends. If "most" is all photographers, then LR is probably sufficient. But, when we talk about "photography oriented" people, the thought is of people who take the photograph from capture to best representation. Then, at least Elements should be part of the post-processing package.
Not to downgrade LR's "Develop" module, but I think the photographer who wants to finish the process is handcuffed without PS in some form.
finish what process? lightroom can do a *lot*, without any handcuffs.
most people aren't going to composite multiple images,Composite? Composites have nothing to do with it. You ever heard of Layer Masks? Other processing involving Layers?
but those that do can get photoshop elements or cs/cc and use it with lightroom.Naughty, naughty. Snipping to delete pertinent commentary. My post included: