Subject | Re: post processing |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 03/13/2014 22:15 (03/13/2014 17:15) |
Message-ID | <2i74i95akjcnjkpjdq3p15sa9adjpqtn8g@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (26m) > Tony Cooper |
nospamThe "learning curve" is about how long it takes a person to become proficient, and "proficient" is based on the person's needs. The people who use Gimp don't - as a rule - have high-end needs. Starting at Day One, two people of equal ability to work with a new program will be proficient enough in the same number of days in either program.
In article <evo3i9p9n2fuik675s20suc9q39b7kqlq3@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony Coopernospam
Elements includes Layers, and has for several versions. Missing from Elements is the ability to use a Layer Mask, but Layers is there.
Lightroom accepts PS plug-ins.
some of them. not all. photoshop supports a wide variety of plug-ins.Tony Coopernospam
Lightroom is no more over-the top for editing than CS or Elements. Some might say it's less complicated, but that's not a definable statement since it depends entirely on to what extent editing will be done on an image.Tony CooperYouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle
As powerfull as PS CS is the Gimp ; the learning curve is step or worse. But at last, it is free.
The learning curve for Gimp is no different than the learning curve for CS, Elements, or Lightroom for basic editing. It is a bit more difficult to learn only because there are fewer tutorials, and some of the tutorials are not as well done as the ones for the Adobe products.
it's more difficult because it was designed by geeks who don't know much about ui/ux design. photoshop was desgined by photographers and graphic artists *for* photographers and graphic artists, and it's been refined over the years.