Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/07/2006 21:17 (07/07/2006 21:17) |
| Message-ID | <mr-C9F1A3.21171307072006@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
In article <C0D3D3A9.54692%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
This is a semantic diversion, and part of your trolling game. Google probably doesn't index csma.sandman.net because no other web page is linked to it. Instead of trying to argue that csma.sandman.net IS indexed (which is your argument) you want to prove the claim "no other web page is linked to it" wrong as a diversion.SandmanSnit
Hehe, Michael thinks that Googles usenet indexing is the same as indexing of web pages. Hilarious. You're on a holy "Prove That Snit Is Ignorant About Google, Dreamweaver and the Internet" crusade. :-D
You claimed that your site is not linked from any other web page.
I showed you how to find over 250 web pages that *do* link to your site.
Any questions?
Problem is, Google doesn't follow web links from its usenet indexing and index them in its web indexing, since if they did, csma.sandman.net would be indexed.
Snit Objective Troll Criteria Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 [ ] Obfuscation 2 [ ] Antagonizing threads 3 [ ] Ignoring evidence 4 [ ] Antagonizing through other media 5 [ ] Quote-scavanging 6 [ ] Thread hijacking 7 [ ] Projection 8 [ ] Unsubstantiated accusations 9 [ ] Unsubstantiated "refutations" 10 [ ] Forging posts and material 11 [ ] Insults 12 [ ] Role Reversal 13 [ ] Lying 14 [ ] Having an agenda 15 [X] Diversion ----------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Diversion ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When the troll gets tangled up in his lies and obfuscation in a way where there is no way to move his argument further, he will create a diversion. This is also where the trolls agenda [1] is mostly shown and the troll will begin talking about other issues he or she is having in order to divert away from the current failure.
And example is this [2], when Michael all of a sudden brings up a totally unrelated issue regarding a specific quote Steve has been posting in an issue that deals with whether Steve had commented on dreamweaver. Note how he claims to have moved the goalpost "back" while introducing a totally unrelated issue.
1:<http://csma.sandman.net/texter/read.php?id=102889> 2:<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4111bc3c408 a9354>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Objective Troll Criteria http://csma.sandman.net/TrollCriteria ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Sandman[.net]
07/02/2006-
