Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
From | Snit |
Date | 07/05/2006 14:56 (07/05/2006 05:56) |
Message-ID | <C0D10523.54133%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (18h & 15m) > Snit |
SandmanThat explains why you removed it from the Google cache. Thanks!
In article <C0D04854.5406B%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SandmanSnithttp://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreadsSteve Carroll
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.
Nice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)
Hey, Snit... you see this? <suppressing much laughter>
No doubt, Sandman's skills at making a page *look* better are improving...
Improving since when, Michael? csma.sandman.net has looked like that for a year or so. :-D
I can get the fact that you are in deep denial just right. LOL!SnitSandman
Places where he has taken my advice to heart:
What advice?SnitSandman
* He is making much better use of white space
Nothing has changed with regards to white space, and you never gave any advice with regards to it either.SnitSandman
* He is handling contrast much, much better.
Nothing has changed with regards to contrast and you never gave any advice with regards to it either.SnitSandman
* His images are nor about 10 x larger than they need to be.
Nothing has changed with regards to image size and you never gave any advice with regards to it either.
Damn, you just can't get anything right, can you? :-D