Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Snit
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSnit
Date07/03/2006 09:06 (07/03/2006 00:06)
Message-ID<C0CE100F.53BD6%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (18m)

"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>stated in post mr-D7B8A4.08484003072006@individual.net on 7/2/06 11:48 PM:

Sandman
In article <ka0qg.40092$x.270079@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com>wrote:

Snit
No matter how you spin it, Sandman, Wally is being no more honest nor honorable than you... you are both lying trolls.

Sandman
Yet we're not the most hated persons in csma, nor are we the most killfiled people in csma... That would be... you.

Go figure.

NRen2k5
Which has exactly nothing to do with being honest or honourable.

Sandman
Of course not. Why?

Better question: why is it that when your lies and ignorant claims are pointed out you sink to more lies and more personal attacks, Sandman? Have you no shame?

-- ? As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse ? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality") ? One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted

Sandman (18m)