Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/04/2006 10:30 (07/04/2006 10:30) |
| Message-ID | <mr-BA5E3C.10304704072006@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (2m) > Sandman Steve Carroll (14h & 22m) > Sandman |
In article <C0CF6F89.53F04%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
You will find substantiation here:SandmanSnit
Yeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.
-- Sandman[.net]
07/02/2006-
