Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

NRen2k5
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromNRen2k5
Date07/03/2006 05:28 (07/02/2006 23:28)
Message-ID<%80qg.40046$x.269667@weber.videotron.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsGreyCloud
FollowupsGreyCloud (15m)
Snit (1h) > NRen2k5
Lars Träger (16h & 28m) > NRen2k5

GreyCloud wrote:

GreyCloud
Snit wrote:

Snit
"NRen2k5" <nomore@email.com>stated in post OdVpg.25346$x.128368@weber.videotron.net on 7/2/06 12:35 PM:

NRen2k5
Snit wrote:

Snit
The ad in question: <http://snipurl.com/viruswhatvirus>Quote in question (slowed down): <http://snipurl.com/Slow_Quote>"no no do not be a hero, ***LAST YEAR*** there are 114,000 known viruses for PCs." [emphasis mine, poor grammar Apple's]

1) Wally dishonestly "quoted" the Apple commercial (while blaming others for doing so). He dishonestly denied it state "last year" and "quoted" it as: "no no do not be a hero, actually there are 114,000 known viruses for PC's.........". In his doing so, he used poor grammar (note the "PC's"). This is relevant based on #2:

NRen2k5
"PC's" (as opposed to "PCs") *is* the proper way to write it, actually.

Snit
http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/ ----- Apostrophes are NEVER ever used to denote plurals! Common examples of such abuse (all seen in real life!) are: Banana's for sale which of course should read Bananas for sale Menu's printed to order which should read Menus printed to order etc.

GreyCloud
Correct. I don't know what he is doing, but PCs is correct.

I looked it up just now. Strictly speaking, you only use an apostrophe when the initialism has internal punctuation, for example Ph.D.'s.

Colour me surprised - this means that my college English teacher was wrong!

Buuut, in modern times, it's *acceptable* to use an apostrophe when pluralizing any initialism.

-- http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/

GreyCloud (15m)
Snit (1h) > NRen2k5
Lars Träger (16h & 28m) > NRen2k5