Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/06/2006 09:16 (07/06/2006 09:16) |
| Message-ID | <mr-3B84F4.09163106072006@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (6h & 7m) > Sandman |
In article <C0D10573.54134%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
SnitSnit Objective Troll Criteria Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 [ ] Obfuscation 2 [ ] Antagonizing threads 3 [ ] Ignoring evidence 4 [ ] Antagonizing through other media 5 [ ] Quote-scavanging 6 [ ] Thread hijacking 7 [X] Projection 8 [ ] Unsubstantiated accusations 9 [ ] Unsubstantiated "refutations" 10 [ ] Forging posts and material 11 [ ] Insults 12 [ ] Role Reversal 13 [ ] Lying 14 [ ] Having an agenda 15 [ ] Diversion ----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>stated in post mr-7612D9.08090805072006@individual.net on 7/4/06 11:09 PM:SandmanSnit
In article <C0D0409C.54056%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SnitSandman
I do wonder if you think *anyone* is stupid enough to believe your delusion
This is always as funny. You always say this as if you're on equal basis as the "other" poster. As if there is a group of normal people that agrees with you on these "do you really think *anyone*..." tantrums.
Yet no one ever comes into these threads agreeing with you. Go figure.
Psssst. Hey, Sandman. Yeah, you.
You could have made it look like you were less full of shit by not snipping the context. Just thought I would give you a little tip.
Oh, and your personal attacks are not funny. Work on your comedy routine a bit more, OK?
7. Projection ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Entire essays could be written on this particular criteria. Suffice it to say, that a troll is often eager to project his own shortcomings upon others so his own will be less obvious. For instance, a troll is often found accusing its "opponents" of the things he himself is being accused of, often using the same phrasing. A good example of this is Michael Glassers "Snit Circus", a term coined by Sandman [1]to describe the never ending loop of Snit trolling most threads Michael Glasser joins end up in. Michael himself has since then tried to label his opponents posts as a circus, calling them troll and picking up current phrases used to describe him. The troll does this so that a casual reader who isn't informed will see these labels in reference to not only the trolls actions, but also his opponents actions.
1:<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3c374e5a389 1fa0b>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Objective Troll Criteria http://csma.sandman.net/TrollCriteria ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Sandman[.net]
07/02/2006-
