Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Sandman
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSandman
Date07/03/2006 21:04 (07/03/2006 21:04)
Message-ID<mr-E9E52A.21044003072006@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSteve Carroll (1h & 22m)

In article <C0CE99C2.53C7B%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:

Sandman
Reading the above, I smile a bit and try to imagine how it is to be a troll like you Snit. Where everything has to be an argument.

Isn't it funny that Wally, Steve Carroll, Elizabot and a whole slew of other people that you call troll only are called trolls and liar by you, on a regular basis?

I mean, sure, we're called liars/trolls now and then even by others (and has been shown, often by other people that have an almost Snit-like network of people around them that identify them as trolls as well: Josh McKee, Mayor, Edwin, and so on). But even considering this, neither of us are in a situation where we are being called trolls and/or liars ALL THE TIME by several people in several threads.

Isn't that funny? I mean, it's doubly funny when you work so hard to try to deny that you are a troll because - I'm assuming - being a troll would detract from some kind of imaginary credibility you think you have. If you admit you're a troll, this imagianry credibility (which, by the way, only you think you have) will be lost.

The fact that so many has you killfiled, and so many calls you a troll is of no concern to you. You just claim they all are trolls back and think you have logic on your side. Hehe :)

Snit
All that babbling from you, Wally

Hahaha! You're so tightly locked into cut'n'paste block mode that you can't even keep up with who's who.

You made a good choice in running from the above though, there is no way you can face it honestly.

-- Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll (1h & 22m)