Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Wally |
| Date | 07/03/2006 03:37 (07/03/2006 03:37) |
| Message-ID | <C0CE95C5.C316%wally@wally.world.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On 3/7/06 2:59 AM, in article C0CD65A2.53A4E%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit" <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
SnitNo! the original is fine, Why do you need to get away from the posts in the original thread Snit? Oh of course...I see!
"Wally" <wally@wally.world.net>stated in post C0CE18C6.C222%wally@wally.world.net on 7/2/06 9:43 AM:WallySnit
On 2/7/06 11:30 PM, in article C0CD34A0.539F7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit" <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
Why do you feel the need to have multiple threads with the same content Snit?
I am working against your desperate attempts to obfuscate. Let's make a deal to discuss your lies about the ad only in this thread, OK?
-- "I have become very cautious in my wording - to the point of including enough disclaimers as to make the actual point harder to see."-Snit
07/02/2006-
