Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | NRen2k5 |
| Date | 07/03/2006 21:19 (07/03/2006 15:19) |
| Message-ID | <15eqg.78203$x.391435@weber.videotron.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (7m) Sandman (10m) > NRen2k5 Steve Carroll (38m) > NRen2k5 |
Snit wrote:
SnitI'm wondering too. You'd think they could at least learn from us how to engage in proper intellectual discourse.
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-F37E26.11042503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 10:04 AM:SnitSteve CarrollFair enough. Do you have a reference for the example you give?NRen2k5
I can't find the one I read last night, but here's another: http://tinyurl.com/qq5t
The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|
For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.
Should be good enough for Snit as he has used this source repeatedly to make claims of his own (and we all know Snit is no hypocrite;) You should expect an apology from him at any time. LOL!
What do you think I owe him an apology for?
-- http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/
07/02/2006-
