Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
From | Snit |
Date | 07/05/2006 15:29 (07/05/2006 06:29) |
Message-ID | <C0D10CD3.5414A%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (17h & 46m) > Snit |
SandmanIt is rather funny that you now have decent looking page.
In article <noone-61E38D.16530004072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>wrote:SandmanSteve CarrollSandmanYeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations
You will find substantiation here:
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.
Nice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)
Hehe :-D