Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Snit
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSnit
Date07/05/2006 15:29 (07/05/2006 06:29)
Message-ID<C0D10CD3.5414A%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (17h & 46m) > Snit

"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>stated in post mr-B8E9CF.07563705072006@individual.net on 7/4/06 10:56 PM:

Sandman
In article <noone-61E38D.16530004072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>wrote:

Yeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.

Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations

Sandman
You will find substantiation here:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads

Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.

Steve Carroll
Nice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)

Sandman
Hehe :-D

It is rather funny that you now have decent looking page.

Funny how you claim it has been that way for a long time but you took it from the Google cache. Sure is funny.

-- ? Things which are not the same are not "identical" ??Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree) ? OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)

Sandman (17h & 46m) > Snit