Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 07/05/2006 00:53 (07/04/2006 16:53) |
| Message-ID | <noone-61E38D.16530004072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Snit (38m) > Steve Carroll Snit (3h & 16m) Sandman (7h & 3m) |
In article <mr-BA5E3C.10304704072006@individual.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanNice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)
In article <C0CF6F89.53F04%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SandmanYeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations
You will find substantiation here:
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.
Hey, Snit... you see this? <suppressing much laughter>
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit
07/02/2006-
