Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/06/2006 21:42 (07/06/2006 21:42) |
| Message-ID | <mr-D58E52.21420306072006@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (2h & 45m) > Sandman |
In article <C0D2B1B3.5445C%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
SnitSays the guy that thinks Google indexes all subdomains when it indexes one domain! :-D
All that babbling from you and you *still* can't explain why Google "lost" the cache to your site.
Please tell us all how Google finds out about all these subdomains, Michael. Please detail the process.
The most funniest part is that you are here, screaming wildly that I removed something from google cache - something you only *assumed* was there, because Google has cached ANOTHER page.
Haha! I'm sure you teach that at your alleged dreamweaver class.
"Don't worry about linking to other subdomains - Google finds them all automatically, through magic actually. It's really cool - I have a forged PDF here to outline how it works. Look at the IP number - it is in a different FONT! DAMN YOU STEVE MACKAY!!!! Oh, sorry... Well, do you see the IP? I mean, Sandmans cached page? No? Hahaha! TOLD YOU SO SANDMAN!! THEY CAN'T SEE IT EITHER!!! Hahahahaha! You REMOVED IT! Google HAD IT and you REMOVED IT before I could look at it, you BASTARD!!!!!"
Apart from that - when you snipped and ran from reality - you also ran from this, I want an answer to this:
Again, why did I remove it in this fantasy? What was my motive? I don't even remember why you're insisting I removed it. How does it help you in your troll?
-- Sandman[.net]
07/02/2006-
