Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 07/04/2006 00:22 (07/03/2006 16:22) |
| Message-ID | <noone-FFBEB9.16225303072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
In article <C0CED0A1.53D7A%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
SnitI didn't miss the context where you whined about his error/dishonesty... etc.
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-B0671B.14112303072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 1:11 PM:SnitSteve CarrollNRen2k5Snit
The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|
For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.
Again, fair enough. It is a nit-picky enough point that I certainly would never have brought it up
You say this, yet, you bothered to whine about his 'error'.
Wow! Steve, when you snip all context you can pretend you have a point.
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit
07/02/2006-
