Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Snit
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSnit
Date07/04/2006 10:33 (07/04/2006 01:33)
Message-ID<C0CF75F2.53F1B%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (15m) > Snit

"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>stated in post mr-BA5E3C.10304704072006@individual.net on 7/4/06 1:30 AM:

Sandman
In article <C0CF6F89.53F04%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:

Yeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.

Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations

Sandman
You will find substantiation here:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads

Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.

Other than proving you have an agenda, showing off your antagonizing media or whatever you call it, and otherwise proving you fit your own criteria, did you have a point you wanted to make?

-- ??Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC ? Teaching is a "real job" ? The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"

Sandman (15m) > Snit