Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
From | Snit |
Date | 07/04/2006 10:33 (07/04/2006 01:33) |
Message-ID | <C0CF75F2.53F1B%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (15m) > Snit |
SandmanOther than proving you have an agenda, showing off your antagonizing media or whatever you call it, and otherwise proving you fit your own criteria, did you have a point you wanted to make?
In article <C0CF6F89.53F04%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SandmanYeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations
You will find substantiation here:
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.