Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Steve Carroll
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSteve Carroll
Date07/05/2006 03:13 (07/04/2006 19:13)
Message-ID<noone-786ADD.19130604072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (37m) > Steve Carroll

In article <C0D04854.5406B%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:

Snit
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-61E38D.16530004072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/4/06 3:53 PM:

Steve Carroll
In article <mr-BA5E3C.10304704072006@individual.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <C0CF6F89.53F04%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:

Yeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.

Snit
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations

Sandman
You will find substantiation here:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads

Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.

Steve Carroll
Nice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)

Hey, Snit... you see this? <suppressing much laughter>

Snit
No doubt, Sandman's skills at making a page

...look good are far better than yours? Yes, I know... I suspect most everyone knows.

-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit