Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Snit
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSnit
Date07/05/2006 00:02 (07/04/2006 15:02)
Message-ID<C0D0337F.54034%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSteve Carroll

"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-B2D6ED.13581503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 12:58 PM:

Steve Carroll
In article <15eqg.78203$x.391435@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com>wrote:

NRen2k5
Snit wrote:

Snit
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-F37E26.11042503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 10:04 AM:

Fair enough. Do you have a reference for the example you give?

NRen2k5
I can't find the one I read last night, but here's another: http://tinyurl.com/qq5t

The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|

For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.

Steve Carroll
Should be good enough for Snit as he has used this source repeatedly to make claims of his own (and we all know Snit is no hypocrite;) You should expect an apology from him at any time. LOL!

Snit
What do you think I owe him an apology for?

NRen2k5
I'm wondering too.

Steve Carroll
Realistically, not a thing... (no one really owes a troll anything) I was just holding Snit to the same standard he tries to hold everyone else.

Do you think your sidestep shuffle worked, Steve? You still have not explained why I would owe NRen2k5 an apology on this matter or why *anyone* would think I did.

You simply did not understand what you were reading. It is your norm. Feel free to keep trying to obfuscate that fact - I doubt anyone is stupid enough to fall for your BS.

NRen2k5
You'd think they could at least learn from us how to engage in proper intellectual discourse.

Steve Carroll
LOL!

-- ? As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse ? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality") ? One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted