Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/06/2006 09:15 (07/06/2006 09:15) |
| Message-ID | <mr-66EE6D.09154306072006@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (6h & 7m) > Sandman |
In article <C0D10CD3.5414A%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:
Why?SnitSandmanSteve CarrollSandmanSandmanSnit
Yeah, I noticed. He's doing a lot of "ignore facts and make up a flase summary instead" lately.
Sandman fits his own trolling criteria: Unsubstantiated accusations
You will find substantiation here: http://csma.sandman.net/pages/AntagonizingThreads
Look at Examples. They grow you know. It's only one so far, but the save-back function of the Trolling Criteria was just recently developed.
Nice *looking* page you have there, Sandman;)
Hehe :-D
It is rather funny that you now have decent looking page.
Funny how you claim it has been that way for a long time but you took it from the Google cache. Sure is funny."took it from the Google cache"? Are you insane? What are you talking about? How do I control the Google cache?
I think it's pretty safe to assume that Google never indexed csma.sandman.net since it's not linked to by any other web page as far as I know.
-- Sandman[.net]
07/02/2006-
