Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Sandman
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSandman
Date07/07/2006 09:36 (07/07/2006 09:36)
Message-ID<mr-C235CE.09362207072006@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (15m) > Sandman

In article <C0D3586B.545E6%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:

Sandman
"Do you think Google just decided to not cache that part (csma.sandman.net) of your site even though they cached the rest (www.sandman.net)?" - Snit

Snit thinks that the subdomain csma.sandman.net is cached in Google if www.sandman.net is cached in google, even though they are completely different sites.

Snit
Incorrect. Just because they cached different subdomains and you had them drop one cache does not mean that if one is cached the other must be. I was, and am, merely pointing out that you had Google drop one cache and not the other.

But you've never seen the cache of csma.sandman.net. You just assumed it was there because you thought google automagically indexed all subdomains since you knew that it had the cache of www.sandman.net :-D

Or are you claiming that you HAVE seen the google cache of csma.sandman.net?

You still have not even tried to explain why they would drop your csma domain but not your www domain.

Obviously because they've never indexed the csma domain since it isn't linked to from any other web page.

Oh, and being that you have dug through several of my *different* domains trying to find pages that would not validate you *know* your claim about me is a lie. Again, it is not just a misunderstanding of yours - you openly are lying. And I am calling you on it.

What the hell are you talking about?

Sandman
Please tell us all how Google finds out about all these subdomains, Michael. Please detail the process.

Well? I want to know :-D

Snit
Google does not specificy how they find all the pages they do.

So, you're claiming that Google knows about all subdomains but you can't support it? Gotcha. :-D

Sandman
The most funniest part is that you are here, screaming wildly that I removed something from google cache - something you only *assumed* was there, because Google has cached ANOTHER page.

Still funny. :)

Still funny :)

Snit
Please note: Sandman *still* has not explained why Google would "lose" the cache of his site.

Sandman
How can I explain something that has never happened?

Snit
Have you gotten the cache re-added yet?

How do I do that?

As for your motive, Sandman, who cares why you lie so much.

Sandman
Let's pretend that I *am* lying about me removing csma.sandman.net from the google cache. What am I hiding? What can be seen in the cache? What are you looking for that can only be seen in the cache? You don't seem to even know yourself why the google cache of csma.sandman.net is so important to you.

Snit
Do you deny claiming that you had not changed the look of your site for months?

A year or so, yes.

Who do you think you are fooling by making claims about the past of your site and then removing the contrary evidence from the Google cache?

So, you saw a cached google page of csma.sandman.net with a different layout? Is this your claim?

Come on, Sandman, your lie is pretty damned transparent. Even you must realize that by now.

Your ignorance about google is way to funny :)

Oh, and I see your site is down ... betcha your Googlebot noarchive tags are mysteriously gone when it comes back.

Nopes, the server died yesterday, I'm having replacement parts shipped in today, so I hope it will be up soon. :(

-- Sandman[.net]

Snit (15m) > Sandman