Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
From | Snit |
Date | 07/03/2006 19:09 (07/03/2006 10:09) |
Message-ID | <C0CE9D67.53C95%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | NRen2k5 |
Followups | Steve Carroll (3h & 14m) |
NRen2k5LOL! Keep in mind I am a Mac user and a Mac supporter... I just do not feel the need to lie about the Mac as others do. Take Sandman for example... he never has explained why he felt his contrived videos "debunked" other people's experiences. Yet, it is he who claimed:
Sandman wrote:SandmanNRen2k5
In article <C0CE52F2.53C31%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SandmanWallySnit
Note how Snit chooses not to argue against any of the points made above!
You lie, above. I state the truth, which you run from. But since you beg me to, I shall focus specifically on your one lie, above, and ignore the others for a moment:
1) you claim I contradicted myself and that this lead me to question someone else's (your) honesty.
Your claim is a complete and utter lie. One, the only "contradiction" I had in any post was a comment I made in error and corrected moments later in a follow up post (as you quote, above), and, of course, that error has *nothing* to do with my pointing out what a liar you are. Not only are you acting as though my honest admission of error was a *bad* thing, you are trying to use my being honest as an obfuscation of your clear and unambiguous lie. In doing so, Wally, you are piling your lies higher.
Reading the above, I smile a bit and try to imagine how it is to be a troll like you Snit. Where everything has to be an argument.
Isn't it funny that Wally, Steve Carroll, Elizabot and a whole slew of other people that you call troll only are called trolls and liar by you, on a regular basis?
Hmm....... maybe because............ THIS IS A MAC NEWSGROUP! Could we really expect a bunch of soulless, spineless hippy cocksuckers like yourselves to forget about your pride for a minute and ever admit the truth?
The group-think defense is the best defense he, Carroll, and several of the others have been able to come up with. "CSMA Moderator" (who is almost undoubtedly a sock puppet of Carroll) even quotes trolling comments about me to try to support their "group think". I have pointed out how I can find just as many disparaging quotes about Steve, but that is ignored by he and the rest.SandmanNRen2k5
I mean, sure, we're called liars/trolls now and then even by others (and has been shown, often by other people that have an almost Snit-like network of people around them that identify them as trolls as well: Josh McKee, Mayor, Edwin, and so on). But even considering this, neither of us are in a situation where we are being called trolls and/or liars ALL THE TIME by several people in several threads.
Isn't that funny? I mean, it's doubly funny when you work so hard to try to deny that you are a troll because - I'm assuming - being a troll would detract from some kind of imaginary credibility you think you have. If you admit you're a troll, this imagianry credibility (which, by the way, only you think you have) will be lost.
So the sheer volume of an argument makes it true? You're even more severely retarded than I first thought.
Please note how he provides no evidence that *anyone* has me kill filed - and keep in mind that both he and Carroll and Edwin have all *claimed* to have kill filed me but continued to respond. Oops. Heck, at one time Carroll even told me he would not talk to me any more until I responded to some BS of his. I think his will power lasted less than a day. :)SandmanNRen2k5
The fact that so many has you killfiled, and so many calls you a troll is of no concern to you. You just claim they all are trolls back and think you have logic on your side. Hehe :)
Pathetic, aren't they?