Skip to main content
news

Re: Apple Ad debate

Sandman
SubjectRe: Apple Ad debate
FromSandman
Date07/03/2006 21:30 (07/03/2006 21:30)
Message-ID<mr-90A8F0.21300103072006@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsNRen2k5
FollowupsNRen2k5 (8h & 20m)

In article <15eqg.78203$x.391435@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com>wrote:

NRen2k5
Snit wrote:

Snit
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-F37E26.11042503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 10:04 AM:

Fair enough. Do you have a reference for the example you give?

NRen2k5
I can't find the one I read last night, but here's another: http://tinyurl.com/qq5t

The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|

For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.

Steve Carroll
Should be good enough for Snit as he has used this source repeatedly to make claims of his own (and we all know Snit is no hypocrite;) You should expect an apology from him at any time. LOL!

Snit
What do you think I owe him an apology for?

NRen2k5
I'm wondering too. You'd think they could at least learn from us how to engage in proper intellectual discourse.

Haha!

-- Sandman[.net]

NRen2k5 (8h & 20m)