Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 07/06/2014 18:17 (07/06/2014 09:17) |
Message-ID | <lpbsq5$tbh$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (2m) > Alan Baker |
No. I claimed that if SOMEONE ELSE was being consistent in HIS argument, then HE must consider the iPad a phablet.Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerKDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyKDT
phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.
----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.
If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for aKDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
tablet<
of theirs....
Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...
no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
No, Fanboy. You don't.
Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....
No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboywell?
And show me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....
Well what?
It's a straw man.
I've never claimed the iPad is a phablet.
You're dodging now... :-D
Nope.
I have never claimed that I think the iPad is a phablet.
But you did claim there was no difference between an iPad with a VOIP app (ala skype) and a phone and both you and karl kept goal post moving by conflating ipads with voip apps as phablets...