Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 07/01/2014 04:39 (06/30/2014 19:39) |
| Message-ID | <lot704$ns6$1@news.datemas.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (2m) > Alan Baker |
On 2014-07-01 02:33:57 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy"Any phablets >designed< as such generally do fit in pockets however."
On 6/30/2014 10:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-01 02:24:36 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
-hh wrote:-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"
It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
circular argument.
Nope. Wrong again.Alan Baker-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.
like hell it did...
It did precisely. In a nutshell:
"All phablets fit in pants pockets... ...except the Galaxy Note 8... ...but that's not a true phablet".
provide a cite where I >specifically< said ">ALL< phablets fit in pants pockets". I mean, generally phablets do, but i never quite said exactly that. NOTE: the 'generally' is just like you like to twist 'typically', and means there may be exceptions.
A few weasel word, but close enough.
The Galaxy Note 8 was designed as a phablet.
06/25/2014-
