Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 07/01/2014 06:30 (06/30/2014 21:30) |
| Message-ID | <lotdgp$3cf$1@news.datemas.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (10m) > Alan Baker Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (5d, 15h & 7m) > Alan Baker |
On 2014-07-01 04:25:28 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyNo. Because, you can clearly hold a Galaxy Note 8 in one hand, so the only way "holding and operation" become a defining parameter something cannot meet is if the two are taken together.
On 7/1/2014 12:21 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-01 04:20:35 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:On 7/1/2014 12:19 AM, Alan Baker wrote:That's ONE parameter, and I think you made it up after your earlier statement.On 2014-07-01 04:15:01 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:one handed holding and operation.If you follow along, you'll find that I don't lie.At least you admit it. I do the same thing myself....a *lot*."A few weasel word"? A "Few"(meaning more than one) is contradicted by the singular "Weasle word". You really are syntactically challenged aren't you?"s".
Happens when you think more quickly than you can type.Well?Not a problem for you I'm sure.Well?No reply?The Galaxy Note 8 was designed as a phablet.
You were supposed to supply some other criteria besides screen size that it didn't meet, but you punked out on that, too.
"But there are other defining parameters which it doesn't meet either."
That's TWO parameters: holding<1>and operation<2>. Whether or not I just made it up is irrelevant. It is both a valid and applicable criteria...
Seriously: do you ever think before you post?
And it most certainly is relevant if you present as an argument something you don't actually know to be true.
06/25/2014-
