Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Date | 07/01/2014 01:24 (06/30/2014 19:24) |
Message-ID | <losrjf$fnp$2@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (5m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Alan Bakerno, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:KDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyKDT
phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.
----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.
If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a >tablet< of theirs....
Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...