Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 07/08/2014 07:58 (07/07/2014 22:58) |
Message-ID | <lpg1b3$l9t$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAnd then follows it with this:
On 7/7/2014 4:21 PM, KDT wrote:KDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On Monday, July 7, 2014 3:40:42 PM UTC-4, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyKDT
I mean really, c'mon. Those tech sites have hopped on an industry
buzzword regardless if it is inaccurately used. As if that is the
first time it has ever happened... ...imagine that.
So where do you think the industry buzzword originated -- it wasn't from the manufacturers -- it was from tech sites.
http://www.androidauthority.com/phablet-history-279494/
Who is to blame?
Cast your eye over the chart above, taken from Google Trends, and you'll see the search term "phablet" began to gain real interest in January 2012. It has generally been associated with the surprise success of Samsung's original Galaxy Note, first unveiled in September 2011. But references to the term go further back than that. Tech journalist Ian Scales used the word phablet to describe the Dell Streak in a Telecom TV article back in 2010. But on Twitter, Dan Warren of GSMA claims that it was him who first coined the term. Regardless of who said it first, it definitely came after the form factor.
From your own link:
"Phablets are recognized as devices with a screen between 5 inches and 7 inches in size. "
That's two sources that define what a proper phablet is., firstSo two sources (at best; Wikipedia really isn't an authoritative source) is "generally considered" now?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phablet
...and now www.androidauthority.com/phablet-history-279494/