Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 07/01/2014 04:31 (06/30/2014 19:31) |
Message-ID | <lot6hl$naj$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (7m) > Alan Baker |
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAnd yet the quote is strangely lacking...
On 6/30/2014 8:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-01 00:28:22 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Well, did you or did you not claim that?Alan BakerNot a dodge. You're evasion in asnswering my challenge is the actual dodge. This whole thing about what constitutes a phablet arose over you and KDT stubbornly constantly conflating phones with phablets.Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerKDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyKDT
phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.
----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.
If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for aKDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
tablet<
of theirs....
Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...
no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
No, Fanboy. You don't.
Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....
No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.
And dhow me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....
And now you've switched to another dodge.You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Yes it is.....
No, actually. It came from YOU claiming that all phablets could fit in pants pockets and the post declaring that any phablet that didn't wasn't a "true phablet".Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
So therefore, I CHALLENGE you to provide a cite where Apple refers to an iPad mini w/a voip as a 'phablet' (or even specifically as a 'phone').
I never claimed the iPad is a phablet.
but you're defending it as a valid exception that qualifies it as a phablet.
No. I've not even mentioned the iPad.
yes you did. You're lying, shill.
When have you ever actually produced a quote?Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyThis was what KDT specifically claimed and you chimed in in agreement way back a few threads ago.Alan Baker
Really?
Quote me.
Why do I always have to provide *you* refreshers on what *you* said....Mr. Alan-heimers.
OOOOOHHHH. The greater context.Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyBack up your assertion. or consider your petulance utterly destroyed...Alan Baker
Back up your claim I ever said a single thing in this thread about the iPad...
"In this thread"? So that's your dodge! I'm talking a greater context which included previous discussions of this in preior threads... and no, I'm not going to waste my time digging them up just to satisfy your petulance.
LOLHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyWhat? Got no hair on yer balls? Try plucking a few from your asshole, Anal, and gluing them on yer nuts...Alan Baker
And we've gone in to full dodge mode!
blah, blah, no true scotsman...blah, blah...'dodge' this, 'dodge 'that...blah, blah, blah...
Face it: you lost a long time ago.
I'm just having fun with you now.
Hope you're having 'fun' wriggling around trying to weasle out of whatt you said previously.
-)